Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Aussies. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Aussies. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Ba, 26 tháng 3, 2013

PM to leave Aussies in loads of debt

Gillard Swan

Prime Minister Julia Gillard and deputy Wayne Swan face the press. Source: The Courier-Mail

GILLARD Government debt levels are forecast to blow out by 60 per cent to $165 billion in this term alone - equal to more than $14,000 for every working Australian.

Analysis of Budget documents reveals that between the 2010 election and Federal Treasury's update in October last year, the 2012-13 net debt estimate rose $54 billion to $144 billion.

With Wayne Swan having junked the Government's commitment to a surplus this financial year, Bank of America Merrill Lynch now forecasts Treasury will raise the estimate by a further $21 billion in the May budget.

"The government is starting to develop some form when it comes to over-estimating the improvement in its budget balance," Bank of America Merrill Lynch chief economist Saul Eslake said yesterday.

Ahead of the budget, the Coalition is honing in on a number even larger than net debt - the total value of bonds and other securities issued by the Government, or gross debt, which has ballooned from $151 billion at the 2010 poll to $267 billion now. In the last budget the Government raised the gross "debt ceiling" from $250 billion to $300 billion.


Opposition Leader Tony Abbott believes Mr Swan will increase it again in May.

Mr Abbott told News Limited yesterday: "If Labor is determined to increase the cap on gross debt above $300 billion, if they cannot show a credible and speedy path back to surplus, if they cannot show a plan to start seriously paying off the debt, it will add further weight to our planned No Confidence motion in the Gillard Government.''

Mr Swan's spokesman said the Government had no plans to raise the gross debt limit. Merrills' Mr Eslake said the increase that had already occurred was "troubling".

"If the trends that look increasingly obvious aren't addressed at some point we might cross that threshold from safe territory to dangerous territory very, very quickly," he said.

Monash University Professor of Business and Economics Jakob Madsen said the gross debt rise was "disturbing".

"It's a dangerous trend and it's at the wrong time. It's completely unnecessary to hand out left, right and centre and the way they do it is not very clever," Professor Madsen said.

Business Council of Australia CEO Jennifer Westacott said spending had grown "out of step" with revenue.

"If that doesn't change we are going to have serious public debt problem," Ms Westacott said.

Mr Eslake, Professor Madsen and Ms Westacott all said Australia did not currently have a debt crisis.

But, Ms Westacott said, "we do have a budget management crisis".

In that context, the Coalition is intensifying pressure on the cross-benchers, seeking support for a No Confidence motion.

Independent MP Rob Oakeshott invited Mr Abbott to call him or come to his electorate if he wanted to discuss a no confidence motion.

"Let's have a bike ride, or a surf," he said.

However, Mr Oakeshott added that he was opposed to a no confidence motion in budget week. It would reflect badly on Australia internationally, he said.Between the 2011-12 Mid Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook and the 2012-13 Myefo, Treasury's estimate for this financial year's interest payments on government net debt soared by 20 per cent from $5.9 billion to $7.1 billion.

The Merrills forecast suggest a further increase in interest payments of as much as $1.1 billion.

Government net debt of $165 billion equates to $14,238 for each of Australia's 11.6 million workers, up from $8001 per worker at the last election, an increase of $6237.

Mr Swan's spokesman said Australia's net debt levels were "dramatically lower" than those of every single major advanced economy: "Our current net debt is 10 per cent of Gross Domestic Product, compared to around 80 per cent for the US and UK and around 35 per cent for Canada.

"The Government will reduce net debt in a sustainable way that ensures our economy remains one of the strongest in the world and protects Australian jobs and economic growth,'' the spokesman said.

To repay the debt, cuts were required "almost everywhere", Professor Madsen said, and the GST rate could need to be raised.

Mr Eslake said not only would spending have to be reined in, but the current $111 billion a year in tax concessions could have to be wound back.

Ms Westacott advocated reducing the current number of government agencies from 932 and making "health dollars work harder".


View the original article here

Thứ Sáu, 22 tháng 3, 2013

Tech giants to Aussies: Screw you

Choice

Choice has some tough questions for Apple, Microsoft and Adobe. Source: Supplied

  • Tech giants front hearing on prices
  • Aussies charged higher prices for music, movies
  • Adobe and Apple defend slugging consumers
  • Apple: 'We'd love cheaper prices'

ADOBE defended charging Australians more than $1000 extra for its publishing software yesterday by claiming that Australians were receiving a "personalised" service on its local website.

Addressing the House of Representatives committee on information technology pricing today, Adobe Australia and New Zealand managing director Paul Robson was questioned about why the company charged Australians 167 per cent more -- $3175 versus $US1899 -- for its Creative Suite 6 software.

Mr Robson said consumers in this country were automatically redirected to the company's Australian website so they could access local discounts and community groups, and purchase Adobe's software at local rates.

Mr Robson said Adobe's use of Australian-only pricing or "geoblocking" was a "well established and legal process" yet he failed to explain why Australians were paying significantly more for the same product.

"We're acutely aware that we can only succeed if we deliver innovation," he said. "If our customers believe they can get better value elsewhere, they simply won't do business with us."

Mr Robson said the company had last month lowered the price of access to its Creative Cloud software service to Australia to deliver fairer prices.

Earlier, technology giant Apple defended slugging Australians more for music, movies and TV shows, blaming the content owners for charging a higher "wholesale price" for media delivered to Australian eyes and ears.

Apple Australia vice-president Tony King told the committee that the company would "love to see lower content prices" in Australia but music label deals and copyright issues prevented it from offering lower prices or opening its US iTunes Store to a global market.

Mr King said record labels and TV and movie rights owners were responsible for setting different digital content prices in different markets and they should be the companies called before the federal committee.

"We would love to see cheaper, lower prices in the Australian market," Mr King said. "The difference in a price will stem from the different in a wholesale price from the owner of the rights."

Mr King said Apple was not responsible for setting these geographically different prices and, despite them, prices in the Australian iTunes Store were "similar" to prices charged in Australian retail stores.

In response to a question by Member for Chifley Ed Husic, Mr King said Apple could not legally open its US iTunes Store to Australian customers.

"When (an individual piece of content) is licenced to iTunes, a condition of that negotiation is that we make it available only for specified markets," he said. "Most rights are still today on a territory by territory, market by market basis. There are few rights that are truly global and that creates confusion for customers."

Mr King said Apple had taken great lengths to ensure its own hardware products were priced at "parity" in Australia, taking into considerations the Australian GST and costs associated with delivering products in Australia.

Earlier, consumer group Choice told news.com.au it has five big questions for the tech companies.

1. Why is it costing Australians 70 per cent more to rock out to AC/DC’s Back in Black on iTunes?

2. Why does it cost a graphic designer in Adelaide $3175 to buy Adobe CS6 Design and Web Premium when a creative in Los Angeles only has to pay $US1899?

3. Why does it cost a small business in Sydney $599 to buy Microsoft’s Office Professional 2013 when a business in San Francisco only has to pay $US399.99?

4. How many of their staff in Australia work on developing software?

5. Who sets the pricing on iTunes - Apple or the music and film industry?

Matt Levey, head of campaigns at Choice said there is "no justification" for why Australians are paying more than US consumers for identical products.

"We have heard all sorts of excuses from the tech companies, like claims that Australian wages, rent and taxes are too high and that our warranties are onerous," he said.

"Our research shows that none of the excuses stack up and the only conclusion is that the technology companies are greedy."

"Today, Adobe, Apple and Microsoft have every opportunity to come clean on their dirty deeds," says Mr Levey.

News.com.au is covering the hearings throughout the day.

Choice


View the original article here